PDA

View Full Version : U.S. to Seek $10.6B for Afghan Aid



Zezima
01-25-2007, 12:35 PM
BRUSSELS, Belgium -- President Bush will ask Congress for $10.6 billion to help Afghanistan strengthen its security forces and rebuild from years of war, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said Thursday.

The money would be on top of $14.2 billion in aid the United States has already given to Afghanistan since the U.S.-led invasion in 2001 that toppled the repressive Taliban.

The request, which Bush will make formally next month, comes after a year in which Taliban forces launched surprisingly fierce attacks across the country. U.S. and NATO forces are bracing for a renewed offensive by Taliban fighters in the spring

"The challenges of the last several months have demonstrated that we want to and we should redouble our efforts," Rice told reporters flying with her to Brussels for NATO meetings on Afghanistan.

Rice said that of the total, $8.6 billion would be for training and equipping Afghan police and security forces, and $2 billion would be for reconstruction. The money would be spent over the next two years.

The aid proposal also comes as the U.S. appears to be stepping up its military commitment in the country.

The Defense Department has said that 3,200 soldiers from the New York-based 10th Mountain Division already in Afghanistan would have their tour extended by four months. In a visit to Afghanistan last week, new Defense Secretary Robert Gates indicated he is likely to ask Bush for more troops for the country.

There are about 24,000 U.S. troops in Afghanistan, the highest number since the war began in October 2001. About half are under the control of NATO, which is gradually gaining more control over operations there.

A senior State Department official who spoke on condition of anonymity gave another indication that U.S. forces in Afghanistan may grow, saying, "We will not be decreasing our military commitment in Afghanistan, quite the contrary."

On Thursday, Gen. David Richards, the top NATO commander in Afghanistan, said NATO-led troops battling resurgent Taliban militants will shortly be reinforced with another combat brigade. The NATO-led force is about 20 percent short of the troops levels pledged by its contributing nations.

Among other issues, Rice will raise with her NATO colleagues are the divisions within the alliance on sharing the burden in Afghanistan. More NATO countries have shown a greater willingness than others to send troops to areas of conflict.

State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said there is a pressing need to address the problem of high levels of opium poppy production in Afghanistan.

"Everybody understands that it's a problem that needs to be addressed," he said. "We don't want an Afghanistan (economy) that is based solely on production of narcotics and international aid."

Officials in the Afghan capital of Kabul said this week that despite pressure from the United States the country's heroin-producing poppies will not be sprayed with herbicide this year despite a record crop in 2006. Afghan officials said there would be an increased effort to destroy poppy crops with traditional techniques _ typically sending teams of laborers into fields to batter down or plow in the plants before they can be harvested.

Fueled by the Taliban, a powerful drug mafia and the need for a profitable crop that can overcome drought, opium production from poppies in Afghanistan last year rose 49 percent to 6,700 tons. That's enough to make about 670 tons of heroin, or more than 90 percent of the world's supply and more than the world's addicts consume in a year.

The U.S. budget request follows a review of U.S. policy in Afghanistan that the White House began last year.

"It had been over five years since we went into Afghanistan and the situation on the ground _ economic and security _ has changed," said Gordon Johndroe, a spokesman for the National Security Council. "There's now a viable government that we're working with. Substantial progress has been made in many areas, but it's also clear that the policy needed to be reviewed, so that we continue to improve the lives of Afghan citizens."

Mademoiselle
01-25-2007, 12:38 PM
and whats your opinion...

Farhad
01-25-2007, 12:39 PM
10.6 Billions more for the War Lords and thier cronies....









God lord, Those war lords are jumping now knowing how much each of them will get from this fund

Zezima
01-25-2007, 12:42 PM
Any sort of monetary help is welcomed whole-heartedly by the Afghan people.

Farhad
01-25-2007, 12:45 PM
Any sort of monetary help is welcomed whole-heartedly by the Afghan people.

Which Afghan are you talking about ? 10.6 is = to 530 billions Afghani ..do you thinbk monies will reach those who really need it ?


These are to pay out those puppet of usa..no wonder Taliban are re gainning thier popularity

Omar
01-25-2007, 01:04 PM
The money will end up back in American NGO and other small private businesses accounts which in return provide minimum services only to suit war lords and corrupt MP's.

Mademoiselle
01-25-2007, 01:07 PM
The money will end up back in American NGO and other small private businesses accounts which in return provide minimum services only to suit war lords and corrupt MP's.

---actually the money will end up back in Maryland....where...karzai's family...is located.....:)

Baktash
01-25-2007, 02:46 PM
They should give the $10.6 Billion to Mademoiselle and let her spend it in Afghanistan on whatever she deems necessary. lol she will probably buy tubs worth $10.6 billion for bubble bath cuz everytime someone complains about something she advises that person to take a bubble bath.

Mademoiselle
01-25-2007, 04:14 PM
They should give the $10.6 Billion to Mademoiselle and let her spend it in Afghanistan on whatever she deems necessary. lol she will probably buy tubs worth $10.6 billion for bubble bath cuz everytime someone complains about something she advises that person to take a bubble bath.

lol..no sweety...i am not selfish...i mean..yeah..bubble baths are good for depression....lol...but i will never spend that money..on myself..or on my family....like Karzai..you know what..his neice...just bought a 6 million dollar house.in maryland...two months ago.....and guess what...the house is paid offf already..so umm..where did the money come from..."ohh he is a loan proccessor.."......BULL****....umm the last time i checked load procerssors.....dont even make that much......i wonder where did that money come from......:wub:

Farhad
01-25-2007, 06:45 PM
lol..no sweety...i am not selfish...i mean..yeah..bubble baths are good for depression....lol...but i will never spend that money..on myself..or on my family....like Karzai..you know what..his neice...just bought a 6 million dollar house.in maryland...two months ago.....and guess what...the house is paid offf already..so umm..where did the money come from..."ohh he is a loan proccessor.."......BULL****....umm the last time i checked load procerssors.....dont even make that much......i wonder where did that money come from......:wub:



And you expect the Afg to love him ? This is why the return of the Taliban unstopable:thumbup1: :thumbup1: Long Live Taliban

Sulayman
01-25-2007, 09:00 PM
Indeed. All of this money will be pocketed by a select few bastards.

Nothing more than lip service will be done, unfortunately, for the poor Afghans who really need the funds.

Mademoiselle
01-26-2007, 05:35 AM
And you expect the Afg to love him ? This is why the return of the Taliban unstopable:thumbup1: :thumbup1: Long Live Taliban

i hold little to no respect..for KArzai...or his family.....and i am not a big fan of Taliban either...they are both currupted......we need a new goverment..lol...

Farhad
01-26-2007, 06:15 PM
A lack of integrity in reconstruction projects could tip some nations toward war instead of peace, says monitoring group

January 20, 2007
Olivia Ward
STAFF REPORTER

More than seven years after a devastating war, Kosovo is still struggling with failing electricity and massive unemployment. In Afghanistan, aid money has fuelled rebuilding, but also corruption and resentment of the government. In Iraq, billions in aid has disappeared and Iraqis are still without jobs, security or basic utilities.

In war-torn places, large reconstruction projects are considered the upside of conflict, helping devastated people to rebuild their homes and lives.

But an international group that monitors aid projects says that too often, billions of dollars are spent without accountability to the very people they're meant to help. And that lack of integrity in reconstruction can even tip countries toward war rather than peace.

"If peace is seen to bring corruption and inequality, and not security and fairness, the threat of a return to war is particularly high," said Jeremy Carver, a founder of London-based Tiri, which advocates transparency and democracy in strife-torn countries

And, said Tiri's chief executive Frederick Galtung, "Afghanistan is a good example. Warlords are given suitcases of cash to stop them fighting. It seems to make eminent sense, but some of them start demanding more money. And when it doesn't arrive, they go back to fighting again."
Afghanistan is the largest recipient of Canadian aid, receiving more than $100 million a year for the rebuilding process that includes grass roots projects in local communities. Millions more flows in from other countries to repair the damage from decades of catastrophic wars.

But Yama Torabi, co-author of the Afghan survey for Tiri, warned that "nearly every time there has been sudden regime change in Afghanistan, it has been linked to the issue of corruption. What is so dangerous for Afghanistan right now is the percentage of the public who perceive the Western-backed government of Hamid Karzai to be corrupt is now some 60 per cent – the highest for an Afghan regime."
Tiri surveyed the impact of post-conflict reconstruction in eight countries and territories, which between them have received $65 billion (U.S.) in aid. The group is backed by Canada, Norway, Britain, United Nations agencies and non-governmental organizations.

The survey, released this week, includes reports on Afghanistan, Bosnia, Kosovo, the Palestinian territories, Lebanon, Mozambique, Sierra Leone and East Timor.

Many of the findings were negative, such as hurried and symbolic road construction projects in Afghanistan done with inferior materials whose lifespan may be as short as three years, and reconstruction in Lebanon so politically fraught that each faction demands its "piece of the pie" before projects can get off the ground.

In the Palestinian territories, aid projects funded by international donors lined the pockets of Yasser Arafat's government and led to its defeat by frustrated voters who had seen few if any benefits from them.

But, researchers found, there were also positive signs: in Serbia's independence-seeking, mainly Albanian province of Kosovo, some projects have won accolades from local people, who were able to join in rebuilding their communities.

"When there is participation from the bottom up, and local communities set the priorities, aid can work very well," Galtung said in a phone interview from Jerusalem. "The farther away from the grass roots those projects are, the worse accountability and confidence become."

It is a mistake for Western donors to impose their own standards on reconstruction projects without being accountable to the local people, he added. "That can lead to incredible waste and inefficiency, and the beneficiaries of the aid are cut out of the process. When they aren't even allowed to know what is going on it becomes completely unacceptable."

Canadian development consultant Ian Smillie, co-author of Charity of Nations: Humanitarian Action in a Calculating World, says the Tiri report has merit, but fears it could give an impression that most aid projects are hurting more than helping.

It follows major aid scandals including reports of billions of dollars in American funds wasted – or diverted to militias and insurgents – in Iraq, corrupt handling of tsunami relief funds in Asia and the squandering of more than $1 billion in aid for victims of Hurricane Katrina.

"What Tiri is trying to do could be quite useful," Smillie said. "Reconstruction must be done well, and all kinds of bad actors can get their hands on aid money if they're not carefully monitored. But it's not helpful to suggest that reconstruction projects cause renewed violence."

In East Timor, Smillie said, violence recurred not because of "bad aid," but because "there was not enough time or attention devoted to sorting out the political differences between those who had lived and fought in Timor during the Indonesian occupation, and those who eventually became the government."

And he added that while aid projects in Sierra Leone are scanty, they have helped to create a more peaceful society after a horrendous war.

"Roads are being rebuilt, schools are being reopened, and I saw money going into a main hospital that wasn't fit for a sick dog and is now completely reconstructed