PDA

View Full Version : Will the U.S attack Iran?



Baktash
02-16-2007, 02:23 PM
It seems to me that U.S is gearing up for an invasion or at least an air strike on Iran in the near future. Tens of thousands of additional soldiers are being rushed to Iraq by the U.S miltary. A few thousands have been rushed to Afghanistan in past few days. Democrat leader in Congress Nancy Pelosi said yesterday that Bush does not have the legal authority to attack Iran. Why would she say that? it means something is going on. And also in the past few days Bush is repeatedly saying that Iran is supplying weapons to insurgents. Seems like he is making a case for going to war. It also seems logical to me cuz the two great enemies of Israel were Iraq and Iran. Iraq is finished. Now it is Iran's turn. And Repulicans want to destroy Iran's army before they are out of power in Dec 2008 presidential elections.

What do you think?

Farhad
02-16-2007, 05:10 PM
American tought they would have a easy task when they invaded Iraq which is the weakest nation in the entire world but now in Iraq thier missions are facing huge problems. Just Imagine by invading Iran what will they face..

I for one wish that they will invade Iran. Iraq was the begining of the end of the American empire and Iran will seal it for good. It cost the American Almost 1 trillions Dollar in Iraq and what will the Invasion of Iran cost them..? Do the Math..:yes:

Zezima
02-16-2007, 07:05 PM
I throughly read the report and it claims that the US has the ability to destroy Iranian military, political, and civilian infrastructure overnight. Don't kid yourself, this will be nothing like Iraq. It will be more like the D-Day landings of 1944, with 120000 soldiers, backed by 7 carriers and 20 submarines, tanks and hundreds of cruise missiles. Lets hope it never happens.

Farhad
02-16-2007, 08:22 PM
I throughly read the report and it claims that the US has the ability to destroy Iranian military, political, and civilian infrastructure overnight. Don't kid yourself, this will be nothing like Iraq. It will be more like the D-Day landings of 1944, with 120000 soldiers, backed by 7 carriers and 20 submarines, tanks and hundreds of cruise missiles. Lets hope it never happens.

And Iran would just sit and take the beating ? Eventhough we know that they would smack the Iranian but I am sure Iranian would send thier forces across Iraq and Afghanistan. The China and Russian would not want the US to be the sole master in Middle East or Central Asia ( The knew that If the US were to control this section then the US will be able to cut the energy resources the Chinese need for thier economy) and they will supply Iranian will everthing it needs. Even now the Russian are supplying Iran with guided missiles. The chinese are helping them to upgrade thier Tank division. The korean are helping & upgrading thier ballastic Missile. Iran is a Nation of 70 Millions and Thier pride are far higher then The Iraqis.

Baktash
02-16-2007, 08:41 PM
I throughly read the report and it claims that the US has the ability to destroy Iranian military, political, and civilian infrastructure overnight. Don't kid yourself, this will be nothing like Iraq. It will be more like the D-Day landings of 1944, with 120000 soldiers, backed by 7 carriers and 20 submarines, tanks and hundreds of cruise missiles. Lets hope it never happens.


was that report in the World of the Watercraft:D

Bilal
02-17-2007, 03:15 AM
And Iran would just sit and take the beating ? Eventhough we know that they would smack the Iranian but I am sure Iranian would send thier forces across Iraq and Afghanistan. The China and Russian would not want the US to be the sole master in Middle East or Central Asia ( The knew that If the US were to control this section then the US will be able to cut the energy resources the Chinese need for thier economy) and they will supply Iranian will everthing it needs. Even now the Russian are supplying Iran with guided missiles. The chinese are helping them to upgrade thier Tank division. The korean are helping & upgrading thier ballastic Missile. Iran is a Nation of 70 Millions and Thier pride are far higher then The Iraqis.

We've seen time and time again, conventional armies CANNOT defeat the US or Israel or UK. We saw how quickly the equivalent of a conventional army fell in both Afghanistan and Iraq, but it was guerilla warfare that we have seen here, and in Lebanon with Hezbollah, that is having more impact. No doubt, if Iran puts up a fight with conventional methods, it would most probably be crushed.


I for one wish that they will invade Iran. Iraq was the begining of the end of the American empire and Iran will seal it for good. It cost the American Almost 1 trillions Dollar in Iraq and what will the Invasion of Iran cost them..? Do the Math..

You wish for the kufr to invade a Muslim Land?! How can you compare American dollars to innocent Muslim lives...

Zezima
02-17-2007, 04:37 AM
was that report in the World of the Watercraft:D

Relax, the report was.........wait a min............have to scroll through my history......ah here it is: http://www.thenation.com/doc/20070305/klare

XLNC
02-17-2007, 07:07 AM
USA will invade Iran in the next 3 months i reckon, because not only Iran is a big threat towards neoconservative/ultrazionist agenda but at the moment the american reputation is at stake. Inshallah the invasion of Iran would be the cause of US implosion the way i look at it.

i have read a coupla replies on this thread on how american military would smack Iran's butt,
you will have to understand that the main body of united states is Israel.... and how far is Israel from Iran? i am sure its within the range of some good asskicking warfare weapons. Personally as much i dont want bloodshed, i think if americans do invade iran it would be in the interest of Muslim world & i pray for the Iranians.

The president of Iran is a very clever man, i hope that one day we will have someone like him leading Afghanistan. The Americans have been trying to overthrow him by funding some factions within Iran but with Allah's grace they have been unsuccessful so far and inshallah it will remain like that.


So down with american puppets and their string pulling zionists, no empire has ever ruled the world for ever... history is the witness... us muslims are in deep pain and sarrow because of our own actions. i think this centuary just like some others in the past have been a lesson for Muslims from Allah that no matter how many sects of Islam, we all have a common enemy.

we might have our differences but we should stay united against luciferians.

payam
02-17-2007, 12:10 PM
0OK....I WAS NOT ONLINE FOR DAYS
ok.......
well from 28 years ago up to now,the attack of usa was probable....also we had war with 42 coutries in 8 years(the iran-world war) ,that was not sadam....that was the usa , soveit and majority countries of world.....so it is not the frist time of us
also we had some face to face ones with usa too........
so as u see its not the frist time
===========================
On Thursday, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said: "The enemies [the US] understand well that the Iranian nation will give a comprehensive response to the aggressors and their interests worldwide."
http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exer...7CF13E0228.htm

Ghezal_
02-17-2007, 01:32 PM
I for one wish that they will invade Iran. Iraq was the begining of the end of the American empire and Iran will seal it for good. It cost the American Almost 1 trillions Dollar in Iraq and what will the Invasion of Iran cost them..? Do the Math..:yes:

So let me get this straight

Iraqis are still dying because of USA and you want them to invade Iran and millions of Muslims get killed once more because you want USA to go bankrupt?


This is just insane

Ghezal_
02-17-2007, 01:35 PM
It seems to me that U.S is gearing up for an invasion or at least an air strike on Iran in the near future. Tens of thousands of additional soldiers are being rushed to Iraq by the U.S miltary. A few thousands have been rushed to Afghanistan in past few days. Democrat leader in Congress Nancy Pelosi said yesterday that Bush does not have the legal authority to attack Iran. Why would she say that? it means something is going on. And also in the past few days Bush is repeatedly saying that Iran is supplying weapons to insurgents. Seems like he is making a case for going to war. It also seems logical to me cuz the two great enemies of Israel were Iraq and Iran. Iraq is finished. Now it is Iran's turn. And Repulicans want to destroy Iran's army before they are out of power in Dec 2008 presidential elections.

What do you think?

I hope USA and Israel get wiped out of the world map but I would not want that to happen for the price of millions of Muslims getting killed…

Farhad
02-17-2007, 06:44 PM
We've seen time and time again, conventional armies CANNOT defeat the US or Israel or UK. We saw how quickly the equivalent of a conventional army fell in both Afghanistan and Iraq, but it was guerilla warfare that we have seen here, and in Lebanon with Hezbollah, that is having more impact. No doubt, if Iran puts up a fight with conventional methods, it would most probably be crushed.



You wish for the kufr to invade a Muslim Land?! How can you compare American dollars to innocent Muslim lives...


Every Great Empire crumble ONLY when they Invaded other country..Now it's the US turn to crumble...I am 100 % sure that Iran will be the cause of the end of USA.( I dont mean that USA will be wipe out but they will lost the greatness and the status os superpower)
The cost of going to war with Iran will be so heavy economicly and therefore this in turn will bankrupt the US treasure..Once a Nation is Bankrupt that will be the end of it's Prime time.


I dont wish any Islamic country to be invaded by anyone but yet no one can stop this aggression by the USA toward Islamic Country.

Farhad
02-17-2007, 06:46 PM
So let me get this straight

Iraqis are still dying because of USA and you want them to invade Iran and millions of Muslims get killed once more because you want USA to go bankrupt?


This is just insane

It's not what I want but this is what will happen...its no stopping now..

Farhad
02-17-2007, 06:51 PM
Iran ( Persia ) is one of the oldest civilisation on earth. Long before there was anglo-saxon (which is the American roots are). The Persia has survived 100's of wars throughout many centuries and this century will not wipe them off either..

K.a.t.s.u.m.i
02-18-2007, 02:10 PM
So let me get this straight

Iraqis are still dying because of USA and you want them to invade Iran and millions of Muslims get killed once more because you want USA to go bankrupt?


This is just insane

Good point!!! :yes:
You know some people sitting somewhere in Europe,America or far Asia reading some istorical faits and they doesn't really care about million "be gno"peopel who dying in such war's....

I think only what America can do now is just drop boms on nuclaire facelity of Iran...,they have no recurce and support of China,Russia....,to begin an ather mistake...

payam
02-19-2007, 10:38 AM
I think only what America can do now is just drop boms on nuclaire facelity of Iran...,they have no recurce and support of China,Russia....,to begin an ather mistake...

And maybe u thought iranian would sit and see hum?

Mustafa
02-19-2007, 11:17 AM
i totally agree wit u said Inferno ... but i dunno how the invasion of iran could bring an end to american empire ... i watch these programs on discovery channel, and all the new warfare weapons they are developping and some of the are already being used in Iraq and Afghanistan, it will be very hard for a single country to defy the US. The most efficient way would be to destroy israel 1st. as for US attacking Iran , i've found this article check it out

01/14/07 -- KUWAIT CITY, Jan. 14 (Xinhua) -- U.S. might launch a military strike on Iran before April 2007, Kuwait-based daily Arab Times released on Sunday said in a report.

The report, written by Arab Times' Editor-in-chief Ahmed al-Jarallah citing a reliable source, said that the attack would be launched from the sea, while Patriot missiles would guard all Arab countries in the Gulf.

Recent statements emanating from the United States indicated the Bush administration's new strategy for Iraq doesn't include any proposal to make a compromise or negotiate with Syria or Iran, added the report.

The source told al-Jarallah that U.S. President George W. Bush recently had held a meeting with Vice President **** Cheney, Defense Secretary Robert Gates, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and other assistants in the White House, where they discussed the plan to attack Iran in minute detail.

Vice President **** Cheney highlighted the threat posed by Iranto not only Saudi Arabia but also the whole Gulf region, according to the source.

"Tehran is not playing politics. Iranian leaders are using their country's religious influence to support the aggressive regime's ambition to expand," **** Cheney was quoted by the source as saying.

Indicating participants of the meeting agreed to impose restrictions on the ambitions of Iranian regime before April 2007 without exposing other countries in the region to any danger, the source said "they have chosen April as British Prime Minister Tony

Blair has said it will be the last month in office for him. The United States has to take action against Iran and Syria before April 2007."

Claiming the attack will be launched from the sea and not from any country in the region, he said "the U.S. and its allies will target the oil installations and nuclear facilities of Iran ensuring there is no environmental catastrophe or after effects."

The source added that the U.S. has started sending its warships to the Gulf and the build-up would continue until Washington has the required number by the end of this month.

"U.S. forces in Iraq and other countries in the region will be protected against any Iranian missile attack by an advanced Patriot missile system," the source noted.

The Bush administration believes that attacking Iran will create a new power balance in the region, calming down the situation in Iraq and paving the way for their democratic project, which have to be suspended due to the interference of Tehran and Damascus in Iraq, according to the source.

K.a.t.s.u.m.i
02-19-2007, 11:19 AM
And maybe u thought iranian would sit and see hum?

what can you do about it??!!..... just sit and talk about it...what you like to do!:winking0001: :lol: :lol:

Sulayman
02-19-2007, 11:22 AM
It's not what I want but this is what will happen...its no stopping now..

You said, "I for one wish that they will invade Iran."

payam
02-19-2007, 11:24 AM
what can you do about it??!!..... just sit and talk about it...what you like to do!:winking0001: :lol: :lol:

when?and whom u are talking about

also knowledge ,kuwaitis are good in propaganda....it has no diffrences with a state of usa....did u know majority in kuwait are migrants from west?huh:D leave them with thier lies

"Afghan_girl"
02-19-2007, 11:29 AM
i think yes

Mustafa
02-19-2007, 11:31 AM
when?and whom u are talking about

also knowledge ,kuwaitis are good in propaganda....it has no diffrences with a state of usa....did u know majority in kuwait are migrants from west?huh:D leave them with thier lies

yea thats true, but i think its somewhat probable that it happens. do u remembre there was a same feeling in the air back in 2003 just b4 the US invaded Iraq ... i guess time will tell us

Ghezal_
02-19-2007, 11:45 AM
You said, "I for one wish that they will invade Iran."

i am sure he did not mean it the way it sounded...

payam
02-19-2007, 11:49 AM
yea thats true, but i think its somewhat probable that it happens. do u remembre there was a same feeling in the air back in 2003 just b4 the US invaded Iraq ... i guess time will tell us

No bro iran is not iraq..its what american govs said it themself
iraqi military had nothing....a destroied one....
just remember the 33 days war between hezballah and israel(the number 5th army in the world)........the israelis couldnt occupite the lebanon like the far past.....hezballah is just a little ex of iranians
also be sure we have the capacity for creating so so hard porblems for usa , globaly

the war with iran is not the war of usa with a dictator murderer like sadam....its the war with whole islamic world

Sulayman
02-19-2007, 11:50 AM
when?and whom u are talking about

also knowledge ,kuwaitis are good in propaganda....it has no diffrences with a state of usa....did u know majority in kuwait are migrants from west?huh:D leave them with thier lies

Because everything is a conspiracy... Look, it's the Zionist Devil Birds!

payam
02-19-2007, 12:00 PM
read the topic of here.....then talk sulayman...ok?

payam
02-19-2007, 12:56 PM
http://mychristianblood.blogspirit.com/images/medium_we-are-all-hezbollah.4.jpg
http://www.dinosoria.com/tragedie/hezbollah_02.jpg
http://www.kersplebedeb.com/blog/hezbollah.jpg
http://www.martinfrost.ws/htmlfiles/july2006/hezbollah_recruits.jpg
http://pajamasmedia.com/upload/2006/07/Hezbollah.jpg
http://yalibnan.com/site/archives/2006/9/img/hezbollah%20rally%207.jpg
http://www.islamicmovement.org/Ashura1428/images/IMG_0091.JPG
http://www.islamicmovement.org/Ashura1428/images/PICT0065.JPG

Sulayman
02-19-2007, 01:01 PM
Have you guys not learned? In the Iran-Iraq war, Western-supplied WMDs absolutely ravaged over a million of your country's people.

Would you like for that to happen again? It's not a proxy war this time around, payam... Iran would be razed to the ground.

nightwalker
02-19-2007, 01:07 PM
the chances of usa attacking iran are alot more now, and they huv already planned this since 20 years.
usa can attack from iraq side and other side afghanistan and take over iran very quickly , but here is the problem , iran is more strong than we think plus north korea has a close relation wed iran becoz both are usa's enemy and now russia has joined them too.
so lets see wat happen , but tell u guys the day usa take over iran that would be the last day of any islamic country.

Bilal
02-19-2007, 01:07 PM
Nobody wants for that to happen.

It is quite clear who the agressor is here, striking pre-emptively with nothing more than baseless propaganda and lies to support them.

Talking to post abov urs. btw, i highly doubt there will be a ground invasion, if they havent even got the majority of Iraqi cities under control.

Sulayman
02-19-2007, 01:10 PM
the chances of usa attacking iran are alot more now, and they huv already planned this since 20 years.
usa can attack from iraq side and other side afghanistan and take over iran very quickly , but here is the problem , iran is more strong than we think plus north korea has a close relation wed iran becoz both are usa's enemy and now russia has joined them too.
so lets see wat happen , but tell u guys the day usa take over iran that would be the last day of any islamic country.

Qiyamah is near... O_O

payam
02-19-2007, 01:31 PM
Have you guys not learned? In the Iran-Iraq war, Western-supplied WMDs absolutely ravaged over a million of your country's people.

Would you like for that to happen again? It's not a proxy war this time around, payam... Iran would be razed to the ground.

iraq is now our allie

Sulayman
02-19-2007, 01:43 PM
You didn't even get the point... I wasn't talking about Iraq.

payam
02-19-2007, 11:26 PM
You didn't even get the point... I wasn't talking about Iraq.

No i got the point , i just answered in breif and undirectly
see......we dont want war.....we want our rights.........justice.....and this is american who doesnt want it

Sulayman
02-19-2007, 11:30 PM
You want your rights, well go talk to your government who's denying you them.

Don't be a tool and just sit idly while your government destroys itself and the country.

payam
02-20-2007, 08:49 AM
You want your rights, well go talk to your government who's denying you them.

Don't be a tool and just sit idly while your government destroys itself and the country.

When im saying we means iranian people+thier governents and they guys who are denying our rights are some few countries in west

BeRTuzZI
02-24-2007, 10:36 AM
U.S. has its plans to invade Iran very soon but I think it will be another Vietnam case – not to forget that Iran has much more sophisticated weapons than what Iraq did. In the mean time, we just have to wait and see when it will start. And I would like to see Russia’s reaction if U.S. really does invade Iran, I wonder what will Russia do since Putin has been making inconsiderate remarks on U.S.’s policies of late.

Farhad
02-24-2007, 01:54 PM
U.S. has its plans to invade Iran very soon but I think it will be another Vietnam case – not to forget that Iran has much more sophisticated weapons than what Iraq did. In the mean time, we just have to wait and see when it will start. And I would like to see Russia’s reaction if U.S. really does invade Iran, I wonder what will Russia do since Putin has been making inconsiderate remarks on U.S.’s policies of late.

Personally, I think Russia and China will supply all the weapons they can to Iran.. They do not want US to be the sole deal Maker in the West Asia and Central Asia.

But even without thier help, Iran will give the US run for their money (Rather Thier Arroganism).. Every Shia Hardliner and ever consertive shia will be in Iran and Iraq to defeat the US..

With all the pounding the Hezbollah took from Isreal in the end the came out victorious.The only way for US to defeat the Iran is to use the nuclear bomb...But then will the streets of US be safe from the Iranian...

fakolta
02-24-2007, 09:45 PM
well ; people of iran love to free from hand of mullah . and as all of you know that iran need food and more life instead of atomic bomb . when you go to tehran you fell that all city under an old dark gery colors and no one is happy . every where is ( fateha ) for karbala and from 10 people 8 of them have black cloth , and in this 30 years iran and iranian all are change to one big matam khana . and you not going to find even one of "those iranian" these day .

fakolta
02-25-2007, 05:16 AM
The only way for US to defeat the Iran is to use the nuclear bomb..

from mouth and heart of one sunny muslim . who killed there own people in said mosque in a muslim country of pakistan to name os sheya . and burn all afghanistan to name of " kaperona " .

payam
02-25-2007, 05:43 AM
well ; people of iran love to free from hand of mullah . and as all of you know that iran need food and more life instead of atomic bomb . when you go to tehran you fell that all city under an old dark gery colors and no one is happy . every where is ( fateha ) for karbala and from 10 people 8 of them have black cloth , and in this 30 years iran and iranian all are change to one big matam khana . and you not going to find even one of "those iranian" these day

when u were in iran?1979? ur imagination of iran or tehran is so funny
how u can say iranian wants what and what?are u iranian?in last election more than 60% of iranian were active.......Maybe u are hearing about iran from the western tvs and medias........
yes maybe we need economic....like all countries....and atomic activities is the 1 of most basic ones in this way...1 of the bases of economic is energy...that's why we are moving to it...adn that's why some few western countries are against it
about black clothes and thouse funny things i must tell u u are a joker...we just wear black clothes in ashora times....the time of morning for imam hoosein..........
sp make ur infos correct....thanks bro


The only way for US to defeat the Iran is to use the nuclear bomb..

from mouth and heart of one sunny muslim . who killed there own people in said mosque in a muslim country of pakistan to name os sheya . and burn all afghanistan to name of " kaperona " .

The part one was so stupid...u want them use atomic bombs agains us?even the klafur americans are agaisnt it
the part 2 has no relation with us
thank u of ur comments!!!!

fakolta
02-25-2007, 10:18 AM
The only way for US to defeat the Iran is to use the nuclear bomb..
this word was posted by farhad jan .

any how I am not Iranian , why you people use bad word ,. i know Iran since 1977 , . there was one park in Tehran , people called ( park e shahr ) , day was job les people use that park , and night all ( obnaie ) of Tehran was there . no disrespect to tehranian of before 1980. but since all jahil Turk who once no chance for them to walk far from ( lalazar ) to north , now take over all Iran , no wander that still real people of Tehran miss those freedom how Iran had once , the example is this that even now in memory of those years people keep those ( paikan & aria ) cars , and people still have those king raze time driver license in there pocket , and same believe that once again those day well be come back , like afghan who never be happy in any part of this world accept Afghanistan .

suraya9
02-25-2007, 10:22 AM
The only way for US to defeat the Iran is to use the nuclear bomb..
this word was posted by farhad jan .

any how I am not Iranian , why you people use bad word ,. i know Iran since 1977 , . there was one park in Tehran , people called ( park e shahr ) , day was job les people use that park , and night all ( obnaie ) of Tehran was there . no disrespect to tehranian of before 1980. but since all jahil Turk who once no chance for them to walk far from ( lalazar ) to north , now take over all Iran , no wander that still real people of Tehran miss those freedom how Iran had once , the example is this that even now in memory of those years people keep those ( paikan & aria ) cars , and people still have those king raze time driver license in there pocket , and same believe that once again those day well be come back , like afghan who never be happy in any part of this world accept Afghanistan .


He called you iranian and you are insulted?...lol that's funny:D

Zezima
02-25-2007, 10:34 AM
what are you talking about, Tehran has beautiful parks.

payam
02-25-2007, 10:51 AM
The only way for US to defeat the Iran is to use the nuclear bomb..
this word was posted by farhad jan .

any how I am not Iranian , why you people use bad word ,. i know Iran since 1977 , . there was one park in Tehran , people called ( park e shahr ) , day was job les people use that park , and night all ( obnaie ) of Tehran was there . no disrespect to tehranian of before 1980. but since all jahil Turk who once no chance for them to walk far from ( lalazar ) to north , now take over all Iran , no wander that still real people of Tehran miss those freedom how Iran had once , the example is this that even now in memory of those years people keep those ( paikan & aria ) cars , and people still have those king raze time driver license in there pocket , and same believe that once again those day well be come back , like afghan who never be happy in any part of this world accept Afghanistan .

i know u are not iranian.....i didnt say this
also....in every nation and city there are dark and light places...poor and rich and in middle.......
do u want me send to u the pic of million poor peoples in new york,that are sleeping in trash box?
so u cant judge the whole country with some places u were and some people u meet.....also we are a second world country and its so clear we are not so good in economic...but hopefully we are moving and looking for futuer

payam
02-25-2007, 10:54 AM
what are you talking about, Tehran has beautiful parks.

every city and country has good and bad places.....
the south of tehran cuase of poor migrrant people who are living thier has not a good sitaution.....but not all tehran and not all iran

Farhad
02-25-2007, 05:46 PM
Simon Hearsh was interviewed today and he said that USA will attack Iran in two days..and I was so stunned hearing that...Oh God..let the victory be on the Iranian this time....Why must the people of Iran suffered because of the Arroganism of USA.

fakolta
02-25-2007, 07:45 PM
every city and country has good and bad places.....
the south of tehran cuase of poor migrrant people who are living thier has not a good sitaution.....but not all tehran and not all iran



well the south of Tehran you means ( akbatan - sar cheshma – cheragh e barq - naser khesro - koche arab ha . in clouding , park e shhar and rah ahan ) was a place that afghan was lived there since 1960 and may before this . today this area are much better them tajrish and wozara who located as you said rich area of Tehran . the tow water canal who was always in king time use to carry garbage a long wali ahhd street are have no any more water , and cleaning of city are too poor , and , it was one “ red light “ area in all Tehran who called ( shar e naow ) , and one was ( un officially - park e shar ) who all Tehran gay was there after 9 pm , to day nearly all city change to “shar e now” and from 10 man 5 are gay .

fakolta
02-25-2007, 07:50 PM
what are you talking about, Tehran has beautiful parks.

Zezama jan !
no more . and people of tehran no more have feeling of going to park or (sabza ba dar ) even .they are sad becaus of a bunch of mulah who wash there ( maqaad ) daliy 5 time . and few years back was really iran a "matam khana" , but now since 911 mulha give same free dom to people .

fakolta
02-25-2007, 08:02 PM
suraya jan !
well yes , yes because this Iranian who run country in these day all are hand in blood of million of there own people , and these are those who burn there own country to name of Islam , and not only this, million of very high educated Iranian are destroy to all around the world , and other million of Iranian are still in 100 of country prison who no one accept them as even refugee . once mahmood hotaki was help Iranian to make them self free from hand of “Turk of ustmanya” and “Russian – tazar” and now God know who can help them to free from hand of this ( Sheland ha ) ,.

payam
02-25-2007, 08:13 PM
well the south of Tehran you means ( akbatan - sar cheshma – cheragh e barq - naser khesro - koche arab ha . in clouding , park e shhar and rah ahan ) was a place that afghan was lived there since 1960 and may before this . today this area are much better them tajrish and wozara who located as you said rich area of Tehran . the tow water canal who was always in king time use to carry garbage a long wali ahhd street are have no any more water , and cleaning of city are too poor , and , it was one “ red light “ area in all Tehran who called ( shar e naow ) , and one was ( un officially - park e shar ) who all Tehran gay was there after 9 pm , to day nearly all city change to “shar e now” and from 10 man 5 are gay .

Tehran has some few rich rich regions....the south is not in good situation..and other sides are in the middle of life's situaion
Yes these are all in that areas.....and i know what u mean bro.......

payam
02-25-2007, 08:15 PM
suraya jan !
well yes , yes because this Iranian who run country in these day all are hand in blood of million of there own people , and these are those who burn there own country to name of Islam , and not only this, million of very high educated Iranian are destroy to all around the world , and other million of Iranian are still in 100 of country prison who no one accept them as even refugee . once mahmood hotaki was help Iranian to make them self free from hand of “Turk of us*****” and “Russian – tazar” and now God know who can help them to free from hand of this ( Sheland ha ) ,.

This is ur idea.....based on infos which are not realastice...if u are anti islamic regim ts non of my bizzy.....ok leave it....

payam
02-25-2007, 08:17 PM
suraya jan !
well yes , yes because this Iranian who run country in these day all are hand in blood of million of there own people , and these are those who burn there own country to name of Islam , and not only this, million of very high educated Iranian are destroy to all around the world , and other million of Iranian are still in 100 of country prison who no one accept them as even refugee . once mahmood hotaki was help Iranian to make them self free from hand of “Turk of us*****” and “Russian – tazar” and now God know who can help them to free from hand of this ( Sheland ha ) ,.

This is ur idea.....based on infos which are not realastice...if u are anti islamic regim ts non of my bizzy.....ok leave it....now the topic is another thing

payam
02-25-2007, 08:29 PM
US generals ‘will quit’ if Bush orders Iran attack


SOME of America’s most senior military commanders are prepared to resign if the White House orders a military strike against Iran, according to highly placed defence and intelligence sources.

Tension in the Gulf region has raised fears that an attack on Iran is becoming increasingly likely before President George Bush leaves office. The Sunday Times has learnt that up to five generals and admirals are willing to resign rather than approve what they consider would be a reckless attack.

“There are four or five generals and admirals we know of who would resign if Bush ordered an attack on Iran,” a source with close ties to British intelligence said. “There is simply no stomach for it in the Pentagon, and a lot of people question whether such an attack would be effective or even possible.”

A British defence source confirmed that there were deep misgivings inside the Pentagon about a military strike. “All the generals are perfectly clear that they don’t have the military capacity to take Iran on in any meaningful fashion. Nobody wants to do it and it would be a matter of conscience for them.

“There are enough people who feel this would be an error of judgment too far for there to be resignations.”

A generals’ revolt on such a scale would be unprecedented. “American generals usually stay and fight until they get fired,” said a Pentagon source. Robert Gates, the defence secretary, has repeatedly warned against striking Iran and is believed to represent the view of his senior commanders.

The threat of a wave of resignations coincided with a warning by Vice-President **** Cheney that all options, including military action, remained on the table. He was responding to a comment by Tony Blair that it would not “be right to take military action against Iran”.

Iran ignored a United Nations deadline to suspend its uranium enrichment programme last week. President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad insisted that his country “will not withdraw from its nuclear stances even one single step”.

The International Atomic Energy Agency reported that Iran could soon produce enough enriched uranium for two nuclear bombs a year, although Tehran claims its programme is purely for civilian energy purposes.

Nicholas Burns, the top US negotiator, is to meet British, French, German, Chinese and Russian officials in London tomorrow to discuss additional penalties against Iran. But UN diplomats cautioned that further measures would take weeks to agree and would be mild at best.

A second US navy aircraft carrier strike group led by the USS John C Stennis arrived in the Gulf last week, doubling the US presence there. Vice Admiral Patrick Walsh, the commander of the US Fifth Fleet, warned: “The US will take military action if ships are attacked or if countries in the region are targeted or US troops come under direct attack.”

But General Peter Pace, chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, said recently there was “zero chance” of a war with Iran. He played down claims by US intelligence that the Iranian government was responsible for supplying insurgents in Iraq, forcing Bush on the defensive.

Pace’s view was backed up by British intelligence officials who said the extent of the Iranian government’s involvement in activities inside Iraq by a small number of Revolutionary Guards was “far from clear”.

Hillary Mann, the National Security Council’s main Iran expert until 2004, said Pace’s repudiation of the administration’s claims was a sign of grave discontent at the top.

“He is a very serious and a very loyal soldier,” she said. “It is extraordinary for him to have made these comments publicly, and it suggests there are serious problems between the White House, the National Security Council and the Pentagon.”

Mann fears the administration is seeking to provoke Iran into a reaction that could be used as an excuse for an attack. A British official said the US navy was well aware of the risks of confrontation and was being “seriously careful” in the Gulf.

The US air force is regarded as being more willing to attack Iran. General Michael Moseley, the head of the air force, cited Iran as the main likely target for American aircraft at a military conference earlier this month.

According to a report in The New Yorker magazine, the Pentagon has already set up a working group to plan airstrikes on Iran. The panel initially focused on destroying Iran’s nuclear facilities and on regime change but has more recently been instructed to identify targets in Iran that may be involved in supplying or aiding militants in Iraq.

However, army chiefs fear an attack on Iran would backfire on American troops in Iraq and lead to more terrorist attacks, a rise in oil prices and the threat of a regional war.

Britain is concerned that its own troops in Iraq might be drawn into any American conflict with Iran, regardless of whether the government takes part in the attack.

One retired general who participated in the “generals’ revolt” against Donald Rumsfeld’s handling of the Iraq war said he hoped his former colleagues would resign in the event of an order to attack. “We don’t want to take another initiative unless we’ve really thought through the consequences of our strategy,” he warned.