Quote:
|
You should first understand what i am talking about, and then, reply.
|
First.. YOU were not talking about anything. What you wrote wasnt even written by you, it was written by Sayed Hossein Nasr - one of the most important figures in contemporary Islamic philosophy:
"Many modernized Muslims, like so many other Orientals, equate science with civilization and judge the value of any human society and its culture by whether or not it has produced science, disregarding completely the lessons of the history of science itself." (Islam and the Plight of Modern Man, Seyyed Hossein Nasr, p. 186)
http://www.islamonline.net/askabouti...uestionID=9159
As we have told you many times - STOP COPYING OTHER PEOPLE AND WRITE SOMETHING FOR YOURSELF. If you want to copy others, then POST YOUR SOURCES!
Quote:
I said there are so many things that Islam has said and Science has proved it now.
And i was talking about those people who think that science is absolutely true. so if science has proven something and Islam has said that too, they think that Islam is true.
|
Okay now one doesnt have to be Aristotle to see the connection between the two cases. You are using different words to describe the same thing. If one says that science has proven many Islamic things correct, then it must follow then that person believes science to be absolutely true. If science was not absolutely true, then it could not "prove" anything, as you claim it has proven Islam.
Hence the situation in your original post:
Quote:
|
Rather, his heart is saying, “Scientific knowledge is absolute truth; thus if the Qur’an confirms it, then it must be a part of truth also.”
|
Remember: Consistency is the key to a successful life :good: